Did the Colonies Justify in Breaking Away From England?

Did the Colonies Justify in Breaking Away From England?Is it possible to understand the thirteen colonies justified in breaking away from England and forming their own nation states? Sample this article for some possible answers. The idea is to raise a more open-minded debate about the subject, and to get to the bottom of the matter.Most of us have heard of case histories like that of the Boston Tea Party, and the controversy regarding its legality. One of the reasons why they decided to break away from England was because they had been abused by the English for centuries. They felt that the King didn't know what he was doing and didn't care about what happened to them. One of the most famous (and quoted) quotes from the Declaration of Independence reads, 'that they have a right to demand these liberties for themselves and for their posterity.'They claimed that the British were abusing the rights that were granted to them by God and the British constitution. This is of course without knowing that the thirteen colonies were not actually part of the British Empire. It is also important to understand that the thirteen colonies did not look to the monarchy or the nobility to rule over them.In fact, the King ordered the Boston Massacre as a means of justifying his refusal to give up control of the colonies. His main target was the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Also of significance is the fact that the King did not like the independence movement.The King wanted control back, and it is from this viewpoint that his attacks on them were justified. Now, since they were not under his authority, it would appear that he had every right to try to impose his will upon them. Therefore, it would appear that it is also possible to conclude that the thirteen colonies were justified in breaking away from England.Although the thirteen colonies were justified in breaking away from England, it is also important to look at why they did so. The thirteen colonies were attempting to seek ind ependence because they wanted to create a new home for themselves. They did not want to be ruled by the King, and they didn't want to have any of the privileges that the monarchy claimed.When did the thirteen colonies justified in breaking away from England? Because they considered themselves to be independent, therefore the thirteen colonies were justified in breaking away from England. They were, however, still subject to the laws of the English Crown.Another thing to consider is that they may have been part of the United States of America, but they really belonged to no country. They had already broken away from England, and hence did not have to follow the rules of the United States of America. This is one of the possible scenarios of what the thirteen colonies might have been considering when they made their decision to form their own nation states.